<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making Mapzen Even Easier and More Fun to Use</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cloudmade.com/2010/01/04/making-mapzen-even-easier-and-more-fun-to-use/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cloudmade.com/2010/01/04/making-mapzen-even-easier-and-more-fun-to-use/</link>
	<description>The CloudMade Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:48:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vid the Kid</title>
		<link>http://blog.cloudmade.com/2010/01/04/making-mapzen-even-easier-and-more-fun-to-use/comment-page-1/#comment-3745</link>
		<dc:creator>Vid the Kid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cloudmade.com/?p=548#comment-3745</guid>
		<description>I notice in one of those screen shots that there are a few polygon features with POI icons inside of them, but not centered.  This indicates to me that the POI icon is actually a separate node, but one which probably represents the same feature already represented by the polygon.  Ideally in OSM, only the polygon is needed, which would have all the tags that might otherwise be put on a single node to represent the feature.  It is an error for an editor to place a node just to make the icon appear.  If Mapzen doesn&#039;t automatically draw an icon in the center of polygon-mapped features, it may lead users to place a node, possibly duplicating information already in the polygon&#039;s tags.  

Since you focus so much on user-friendliness, I imagine the typical Mapzen user will tend to base their mapping and tagging practices on what looks good in the Mapzen editor versus the correct way to map and tag features.  Therefore you must strive to make sure that the correct way looks best in your editor.  You can start by making sure that if a polygon has (for example) the tag &quot;amenity-college&quot; then an appropriate icon should be placed in that polygon, just as if the tag were on a single node.  

P.S. Potlatch also fails to draw POI icons for polygon-drawn features, but I think its users pay more attention to correct tagging because Potlatch doesn&#039;t try to draw everything in an &quot;intuitive&quot; way to the extent that Mapzen does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I notice in one of those screen shots that there are a few polygon features with POI icons inside of them, but not centered.  This indicates to me that the POI icon is actually a separate node, but one which probably represents the same feature already represented by the polygon.  Ideally in OSM, only the polygon is needed, which would have all the tags that might otherwise be put on a single node to represent the feature.  It is an error for an editor to place a node just to make the icon appear.  If Mapzen doesn&#8217;t automatically draw an icon in the center of polygon-mapped features, it may lead users to place a node, possibly duplicating information already in the polygon&#8217;s tags.  </p>
<p>Since you focus so much on user-friendliness, I imagine the typical Mapzen user will tend to base their mapping and tagging practices on what looks good in the Mapzen editor versus the correct way to map and tag features.  Therefore you must strive to make sure that the correct way looks best in your editor.  You can start by making sure that if a polygon has (for example) the tag &#8220;amenity-college&#8221; then an appropriate icon should be placed in that polygon, just as if the tag were on a single node.  </p>
<p>P.S. Potlatch also fails to draw POI icons for polygon-drawn features, but I think its users pay more attention to correct tagging because Potlatch doesn&#8217;t try to draw everything in an &#8220;intuitive&#8221; way to the extent that Mapzen does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://blog.cloudmade.com/2010/01/04/making-mapzen-even-easier-and-more-fun-to-use/comment-page-1/#comment-3740</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cloudmade.com/?p=548#comment-3740</guid>
		<description>Hi Georg - we don&#039;t support WMS at the moment.  What would you like to use it for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Georg &#8211; we don&#8217;t support WMS at the moment.  What would you like to use it for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tester</title>
		<link>http://blog.cloudmade.com/2010/01/04/making-mapzen-even-easier-and-more-fun-to-use/comment-page-1/#comment-3739</link>
		<dc:creator>Tester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cloudmade.com/?p=548#comment-3739</guid>
		<description>Not sure, that hiding of areas will completely solve the problem. In my opinion, user should be able to select any object, even if it is located behind the polygon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure, that hiding of areas will completely solve the problem. In my opinion, user should be able to select any object, even if it is located behind the polygon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Georg</title>
		<link>http://blog.cloudmade.com/2010/01/04/making-mapzen-even-easier-and-more-fun-to-use/comment-page-1/#comment-3738</link>
		<dc:creator>Georg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cloudmade.com/?p=548#comment-3738</guid>
		<description>Does it offer Support for WMS?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it offer Support for WMS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

